Guile Mailing List Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gcc vs ecgs

To: David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com>
Subject: Re: Gcc vs ecgs
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
Date: 16 Nov 1998 11:49:19 -0500
Cc: guile@cygnus.com
In-Reply-To: David Welton's message of Sun, 15 Nov 1998 21:23:14 -0800
Message-ID: <wwn3e7jtwfk.fsf@totoro.red-bean.com>
References: <19981115212314.A18495@gate.cks.com>
Sender: owner-guile@cygnus.com


> Pardon my more banal question, however, I just want to be sure of
> something...  Guile 1.3 may be compiled with either gcc or ecgs,
> correct? (well, it compiles, but I want to make sure it works properly
> as well).  The previous Debian maintainer was using ecgs...

It should compile fine with both.  You may get more warnings from
EGCS than you would from GCC, however.

References:
- Gcc vs ecgs
  - From: David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com>

Prev by Date: Re: gc notes available
Next by Date: Re: M17N
Prev by thread: Gcc vs ecgs
Next by thread: ilu linking error
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Guile Home | Main Index | Thread Index